Lewati ke konten utama

Casbin vs. Alternatives

Open-source authorization tools take noticeably different approaches. This page places Casbin among the most common alternatives so you can tell quickly which family of tool fits your problem. Each linked page goes deeper and says when the other tool is the better choice.

Compared withIn one sentence
OpenFGAA Zanzibar-style relationship service you deploy; Casbin is a library inside your application.
Open Policy AgentA general-purpose policy engine with the Rego language; Casbin focuses on application access control with policies stored as data.
CASLA JavaScript library where abilities are defined in code; Casbin keeps rules outside the code and runs in many languages.
CedarA policy language with schema validation and analysis; Casbin offers a configurable model and a large adapter ecosystem.

At a glance​

The table describes each project as of 2026. Check each project's own documentation before making a decision.

CasbinOpenFGAOPACASLCedar
FormLibrary embedded in your applicationServer with HTTP and gRPC APIsDaemon or sidecar, also a Go library and WebAssemblyLibraryLibrary (Rust core, with bindings)
How rules are writtenA model file (.conf) plus policy rules as rowsAn authorization model in a DSL plus relationship tuplesRego programs plus JSON dataJavaScript or TypeScript codeCedar policy language plus a schema
Main access control styleACL, RBAC, ABAC, ReBAC, and others, chosen in the modelReBACAnything expressible in RegoAttribute and ownership checks on subjectsRBAC and ABAC
Native implementationsGo, Java, Node.js, Python, .NET, PHP, Rust, C++, and moreSDKs call the serverGo; other languages call the server or use WebAssemblyJavaScript and TypeScriptRust, with Java, Go, and WebAssembly options
Where rules are storedYour database, through adaptersThe OpenFGA server's databaseBundles loaded into memoryIn application codeWherever you store policy text
Changing rules at runtimeManagement API, effective immediatelyWrite APIPublish a new bundle or push dataRedeploy, or build abilities from your own dataReplace policies
GovernanceApache Software Foundation (Incubating)Cloud Native Computing FoundationCloud Native Computing FoundationCommunity, MIT licenseOpen source from AWS

What is specific to Casbin​

  • It runs inside your process. An Enforce() call is a function call, not a network request. There is nothing extra to deploy, and typical checks take microseconds; see Benchmarks.
  • The model is configuration. The same engine does ACL, RBAC, RBAC with domains, ABAC, ReBAC, and more. Moving from one to another means editing the model file, not rewriting code. See Supported models.
  • Policies are rows you can manage. Rules live in your existing database through an adapter, and an administrator can add or remove them at runtime through the Management API or an admin portal.
  • The same model works in every language. A model and policy written for a Go service can be enforced unchanged in Java, Node.js, Python, .NET, PHP, Rust, or C++.

When another tool fits better​

  • You need Google-Zanzibar-style relationship checks across billions of objects, served centrally to many applications: look at OpenFGA.
  • You need one policy language for Kubernetes admission, infrastructure configuration, and services: look at OPA.
  • Your application is JavaScript end to end and you mainly want type-safe permission checks in UI components: look at CASL.
  • You need static validation and formal analysis of policies: look at Cedar.

Try Casbin​